Why Full Dentures Expose Weak Points in Your Scanner Workflow

Full denture cases are “scanner stress tests” because they combine large surface area, highly reflective materials, deep undercuts, and two critical surfaces (intaglio + polished). A scanner that behaves perfectly on dies can suddenly look inconsistent on dentures, which leads many labs to assume the unit is failing. Often, the scanner is fine—the workflow and surface control are not.

At Repair.Dental, we treat full denture scanning as a discipline: when you standardise setup, you reduce rescans, protect uptime, and deliver more predictable fit for clinicians.

full denture scanning on Repair Guru

Clinical priorities: what dentists actually judge

Dentists don’t care if the mesh looks pretty. They care about: tissue adaptation, border extension, stability, and occlusal scheme. Poor scanning of the intaglio or borders can translate into chairside complaints like “loss of suction,” “rocking,” or “sore spots.” Those are high-friction outcomes in B2B relationships, so full denture scanning needs a tighter quality gate than routine crown work.

Where full denture scanning commonly goes wrong

The highest-failure zones are predictable:

Flanges and borders (thin edges, shadowing, and frequent holes)
Frenum notches and high-curvature areas
Posterior palatal seal area (subtle form gets smoothed or missed)
Polished surface glare (acrylic shine creates capture dropouts)
Intaglio texture (soft tissue detail may be over-smoothed by processing)

These are not minor defects; they are the areas that drive fit and comfort.

Table: Denture surface → scanning risk → consequence

Denture element	Typical scanning risk	What it becomes clinically
Intaglio (tissue surface)	over-smoothing, missing subtle detail	reduced retention, pressure spots
Borders/flanges	holes, jagged edges, incomplete capture	instability, sore spots, over/under-extension
Polished surface	glare and patchy capture	unreliable geometry for aesthetics/contours
Occlusal surfaces/teeth	alignment and stitching drift	occlusal errors, adjustment-heavy delivery
Post dam region	weak definition	suction issues and retention complaints

Surface control: acrylic reflectivity is the silent killer

Most denture bases are glossy. Gloss produces specular highlights, which scanners interpret poorly, leading to holes or “melted” edges after software smoothing. A controlled matting approach (when needed) is not about making the scan “look matte”—it’s about making reflectance uniform.

Key rule: keep it consistent and light. Over-application can soften borders and change contours, which is just as damaging as glare.

Fixturing: movement destroys big arches

Full dentures are lightweight and can micro-shift during rotation. Even tiny movement causes stitching drift across a large mesh. Labs often respond by recalibrating, but the faster fix is usually stability:

Use a fixture that prevents rocking and rotational slip
Avoid compressible pads that allow creep
Ensure the denture is centred and balanced on the platform
Keep the orientation repeatable between operators

If a scan improves dramatically when one technician does it “their way,” you likely have a fixturing/handling variability problem.

Recommended scan sequencing (to reduce holes and drift)

Full dentures behave best when you capture the most critical surfaces first, then build completeness.

A dependable sequence is:

Start with intaglio (priority surface for fit)
Capture borders/flanges with controlled angles and maximum visibility
Move to the polished surface (manage glare)
Finish with occlusal/teeth capture and confirm alignment consistency
If upper and lower are being related, scan bite registration with a repeatable method

The goal is to avoid an “average” scan that misses borders—because borders are where remakes are born.

Table: Scan symptom → likely cause → correction

What you see in the scan	Most likely cause	Most efficient fix
Holes on shiny polished areas	glare / uneven reflectance	light, uniform matting + reduce handling oils
Jagged flange edges	shadowing + angle limitations	adjust orientation + ensure clear line-of-sight
Stitching drift across arch	micro-movement during rotation	improve fixturing and balance
Soft intaglio detail	over-smoothing or noisy capture	improve surface consistency, reduce noise sources
Occlusal mismatch upper/lower	unstable bite record or alignment references	standardise bite capture + reference points

QC checks that prevent expensive chairside adjustments

A quick QC gate saves hours later. For each denture scan, validate:

Borders are continuous with no broken edges
Intaglio is complete (especially post dam and ridge areas)
No obvious “patch” zones where the mesh is missing and auto-filled
Teeth anatomy is stable enough to support occlusal planning
Re-scan repeatability: a second pass on a reference region shouldn’t “shift”

Clinically, this protects comfort, retention, and occlusion—exactly what dentists judge.

Dentist insights: what to communicate to avoid rework

Full denture workflows often involve clinic-provided records (impressions, bite rims, existing dentures). Dentists appreciate specific feedback that improves inputs:

“Border extension appears incomplete—please confirm flange depth and vestibular capture.”
“High-gloss base caused capture dropouts; we used controlled matting to preserve contours.”
“If you need maximum retention accuracy, we recommend prioritising intaglio validation before aesthetic refinements.”

This keeps the conversation professional and reduces disputes.

When to suspect the scanner instead of the case

Full denture cases can hide true scanner issues because they demand more from optics and stitching. Consider equipment-side investigation when:

Multiple full denture cases fail similarly across different operators
Problems persist even with stable fixturing and controlled surface prep
You see the same artefact pattern repeatedly in the same capture region
Scan time is rising and the system appears to “retry” excessively
Calibration appears to “help briefly” but instability returns quickly

That pattern suggests optics contamination, calibration instability, turntable issues, or capture consistency problems—especially if simpler case types also begin trending worse.

How Repair.Dental frames this for production teams

For full denture scanning, the most profitable approach is separating workflow variables from equipment variables fast. We typically recommend a controlled comparison:

Scan a known stable reference object to establish baseline
Scan one denture with improved fixturing and surface control
Compare repeatability and error behaviour
If instability remains, escalate to targeted diagnostics (optics, calibration stability, mechanical behaviour)

This avoids wasting days on “try again” loops and prevents unnecessary part replacement.

Commercial takeaway: dentures reward standardisation

Full denture scanning has a higher failure cost because the clinical consequences are immediate: retention, comfort, and occlusion. When you standardise surface control, fixturing, and QC gates, you reduce rescans, protect throughput, and deliver outcomes dentists can trust. That’s the difference between a lab that “can scan dentures” and a lab that can do it predictably at scale.

Straumann DWOS 7Series, 3Series, or 5Series scanners can face optical errors, software detection failures, or mechanical arm problems that disrupt workflows. Our specialists provide long-lasting solutions with precise calibration. Head to Straumann lab scanner repair experts for free diagnostics and rapid 5–7 day fixes.

Please Visit Repair.Dental or Follow us on Facebook & Instagram.

Full Denture Scanning: Special Considerations